<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The section element</title>
	<atom:link href="http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/</link>
	<description>helping you implement HTML5 today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:47:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/#comment-25735</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://html5doctor.com/?p=858#comment-25735</guid>
		<description>I wondering how html5 will be effected when semantic search comes in and if search engines will still use link distribution as a form of authority. 

I&#039;ve used the section element estensivly in my site about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.make-a-web-site.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;how to build a website&lt;/a&gt; it is a bit basic put if you pull it apart it can work well. 

Thanks for the tips Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondering how html5 will be effected when semantic search comes in and if search engines will still use link distribution as a form of authority. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used the section element estensivly in my site about <a href="http://www.make-a-web-site.com" rel="nofollow">how to build a website</a> it is a bit basic put if you pull it apart it can work well. </p>
<p>Thanks for the tips Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Lawson</title>
		<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/#comment-25257</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://html5doctor.com/?p=858#comment-25257</guid>
		<description>Not at all, Derpa. You might use menu and command elements. Or the being-specified dialog element for dialogues - http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Dialogs 

Article is for re-usable widgets, too - I imagine that web apps use many of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all, Derpa. You might use menu and command elements. Or the being-specified dialog element for dialogues &#8211; <a href="http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Dialogs" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Dialogs</a> </p>
<p>Article is for re-usable widgets, too &#8211; I imagine that web apps use many of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derpa</title>
		<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/#comment-25256</link>
		<dc:creator>Derpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://html5doctor.com/?p=858#comment-25256</guid>
		<description>* use &lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; forever</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* use &lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; forever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derpa</title>
		<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/#comment-25255</link>
		<dc:creator>Derpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://html5doctor.com/?p=858#comment-25255</guid>
		<description>So what about the small percentage of us who are using HTML to make things OTHER than blogs and news sites?  You know, custom tool panels and web applications and such for which your &#039;section&#039; and &#039;article&#039; and &#039;aside&#039; rules are semantically meaningless.  Are we just supposed to screw off and use  forever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what about the small percentage of us who are using HTML to make things OTHER than blogs and news sites?  You know, custom tool panels and web applications and such for which your &#8216;section&#8217; and &#8216;article&#8217; and &#8216;aside&#8217; rules are semantically meaningless.  Are we just supposed to screw off and use  forever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNA Training Tips</title>
		<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/#comment-24897</link>
		<dc:creator>CNA Training Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://html5doctor.com/?p=858#comment-24897</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;CNA Training Tips...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hello, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam comments? If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can suggest? I get so much lately it&#039;s driving me crazy so any assistanc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CNA Training Tips&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hello, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam comments? If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can suggest? I get so much lately it&#8217;s driving me crazy so any assistanc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris LeBlanc</title>
		<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/#comment-24827</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris LeBlanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 21:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://html5doctor.com/?p=858#comment-24827</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for this discussion.

Something minute. The word technology is misspelled in your article...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for this discussion.</p>
<p>Something minute. The word technology is misspelled in your article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alohci</title>
		<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/#comment-24490</link>
		<dc:creator>Alohci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://html5doctor.com/?p=858#comment-24490</guid>
		<description>@boomshanka - that would be the &lt;body&gt; element.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@boomshanka &#8211; that would be the &lt;body&gt; element.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boomshanka</title>
		<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/#comment-23932</link>
		<dc:creator>boomshanka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://html5doctor.com/?p=858#comment-23932</guid>
		<description>Hi Bruce,

Great article (in lack of a better word). I just have one question regarding the outliner tool: When I validate it against www.copenhagenfive.com it shows a single untitled entry, but the site does not use section, nav or aside - only header, figure, figcaption and footer. So which one is triggering the untitled entry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bruce,</p>
<p>Great article (in lack of a better word). I just have one question regarding the outliner tool: When I validate it against <a href="http://www.copenhagenfive.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.copenhagenfive.com</a> it shows a single untitled entry, but the site does not use section, nav or aside &#8211; only header, figure, figcaption and footer. So which one is triggering the untitled entry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/#comment-23461</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://html5doctor.com/?p=858#comment-23461</guid>
		<description>You can also use &lt;a href=&quot;http://schema.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;schema.org&lt;/a&gt; to mark the main content of a web page, because the &lt;a href=&quot;http://schema.org/WebPage&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Web Page-Element&lt;/a&gt; has a &lt;em&gt;mainContentOfPage&lt;/em&gt; Attribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also use <a href="http://schema.org/" rel="nofollow">schema.org</a> to mark the main content of a web page, because the <a href="http://schema.org/WebPage" rel="nofollow">Web Page-Element</a> has a <em>mainContentOfPage</em> Attribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/#comment-21973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://html5doctor.com/?p=858#comment-21973</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dr. Oli,

That flow chart will help a lot. I&#039;ve also been reading through other articles here and one at smashing.com that have helped me see that I was looking at things from the wrong perspective at times.  I&#039;ll read the common mistakes link you provided also.

I have been looking at section in terms of when a developer looks at my code it will be easy to spot the top, middle, bottom, sections and so on. These would be sections inside the main content wrap. So yeah, total misunderstanding on who I am trying to be semantic for, on my part. And maybe some misunderstanding of the definition of semantics too.

At any rate, it&#039;s making more sense as I read the articles here. You guys have a lot of good information.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dr. Oli,</p>
<p>That flow chart will help a lot. I&#8217;ve also been reading through other articles here and one at smashing.com that have helped me see that I was looking at things from the wrong perspective at times.  I&#8217;ll read the common mistakes link you provided also.</p>
<p>I have been looking at section in terms of when a developer looks at my code it will be easy to spot the top, middle, bottom, sections and so on. These would be sections inside the main content wrap. So yeah, total misunderstanding on who I am trying to be semantic for, on my part. And maybe some misunderstanding of the definition of semantics too.</p>
<p>At any rate, it&#8217;s making more sense as I read the articles here. You guys have a lot of good information.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

